Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voleo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voleo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Google play, press-releases, routine (WP MILL) announcements and other not sufficient and not reliable media coverage; fails to meet NCORP BoraVoro (talk) 07:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I would say it is likely that there are no sources meeting all four criteria. Nothing relevant in standard BEFORE or ProQuest. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.